Credit: Canva
Researchers exploring the underlying causes of autism have identified a surprising potential treatment—a widely used cancer drug. Leucovorin, a medication typically prescribed to reduce chemotherapy side effects, has demonstrated promising effects in improving autism symptoms. Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental condition that affects communication, social interactions, and behavior.
The prevalence of autism diagnoses has surged in recent years, increasing by 175% between 2011 and 2022 in the United States. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), approximately 1 in 36 children in the U.S. is now on the spectrum.
Experts believe this increase is due to greater awareness, improved diagnostic criteria, and expanded screening efforts. However, environmental factors and policy changes may also play a role, underscoring the need for innovative treatment options like leucovorin.
Further studies revealed that over 75% of children with autism had folate receptor alpha autoantibodies, which hinder folate transport to the brain. In contrast, only 10% to 15% of children without autism exhibited these antibodies.
To counteract this deficiency, Dr Frye began treating his patients with leucovorin, a form of folinic acid that bypasses the folate transport blockage caused by these receptors to counteract this deficiency. He finally concluded that the drug may help restore proper folate levels in the brain, leading to noticeable improvements in cognitive and social development.
Credits: Canva
Pathogens are responsible for diseases like bird flu, COVID-19, and bat-borne viruses that cause brain swelling. They pose a serious risk to public health, according to biosecurity experts in the United Kingdom. The UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) has recently identified 24 pathogen families that require urgent attention due to their potential to cause outbreaks and pandemics.
The UKHSA has categorized these pathogens as threats for several reasons:
High Contagion and Severe Disease: Some pathogens spread rapidly and cause serious illness, increasing their risk of global outbreaks.
Lack of Vaccines and Treatments: Many of these diseases do not have effective vaccines or treatments, making containment difficult.
Impact of Climate Change: Rising temperatures and environmental shifts may enable the spread of diseases to new regions.
Antibiotic Resistance: Some pathogens are evolving resistance to available treatments, making infections harder to manage.
Eight of the identified pathogen families have been categorized as high or medium risk for triggering a pandemic. While some have vaccines and treatments in development, many remain in clinical trial stages, leaving the world vulnerable to future outbreaks.
UKHSA experts emphasized the need for further research and investment to prevent these pathogens from escalating into major health crises.
Dr. Isabel Oliver, UKHSA’s Chief Scientific Officer, stated that this identification process is crucial for directing resources where they are most needed. “We hope this will help to speed up vaccine and diagnostics development where it is most needed, to ensure we are fully prepared in our fight against potentially deadly pathogens,” she said.
Independent experts have acknowledged the usefulness of the UKHSA list in focusing research and preparedness efforts. However, concerns remain about the exclusion of other potential threats.
Jose Vazquez-Boland, an infectious disease expert at the University of Edinburgh, warned that prioritizing certain pathogens could divert attention and funding from other dangerous but overlooked diseases.
Emma Thomson, Director of the MRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, stressed the importance of regularly updating the priority list. “It is essential that this list remains dynamic and responsive to emerging threats,” she said. History has shown that pandemics can arise from unexpected sources.
Dr. Oliver also highlighted the increasing risk posed by climate change, particularly in the spread of vector-borne diseases. Changing temperatures and shifting ecosystems are altering the distribution of mosquitoes and ticks, which carry diseases such as dengue and Zika.
A report from the UK COVID-19 inquiry found that prior to 2020, pandemic preparedness focused too much on influenza, leading to delays in responding to COVID-19. Experts now emphasize the need to prepare for a wide range of threats, including unknown “Disease X” pathogens.
Mark Woolhouse, an epidemiologist at the University of Edinburgh, warned that a novel measles-like virus could pose an even greater threat than COVID-19. “Such a virus would be more contagious than the original COVID-19 variants, impossible to control with lockdowns, and more deadly—especially to children,” he said.
Credits: Canva
Utah has become the first state to ban fluoride in public drinking water. This has been opposed by dentists and national health organizations who had warned that this move could lead to more medical problems, dental problems and could also disproportionately affect low-income communities.
Spencer Cox, Republican Gov. signed the legislation on Thursday that barred cities and communities from deciding whether to add the mineral to their water systems.
Fluoride strengthens teeth and reduces cavities by replacing minerals lost during normal wear and tea. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) notes that they are naturally occurring compounds and when used in low levels, it can help prevent dental cavities.
The CDC notes that fluoride repairs and prevents damage to teeth caused by bacteria in the mouth. Bacteria in the mouth produce acid when a person eats or drinks. The acid then dissolves minerals in a tooth’s surface and makes the tooth weaker and open to cavities.
Fluoride also replaces the minerals lost from a tooth due to acid breakdown. Some fluoride can replace minerals in the tooth surface, which makes the outer enamel layer harder to dissolve. Fluoride also could reduce the amount of acid that cavity-causing bacteria produce, as well as making it harder for these bacteria to stick to the teeth.
CDC notes that teeth requires consistent, low levels of fluoride in the mouth, in the saliva and on tooth surfaces. Fluoride can also be incorporated into developing dental enamel before a tooth erupts into the mouth, enhancing the tooth’s resistance to acid breakdown and preventing cavities later in life.
As per the US Food and Drug Administration, the fluoride levels in the water is regulated and are safe and effective when used as directed. However, despite this, Utah has banned its use.
ALSO READ: Utah To Become The First State To Ban Fluoride In Drinking Water
Utah lawmakers pushed for fluoride ban stating that it was too expensive. As per Cox, he grew up and raised his own children in a community without fluoridated water. The ban will be effective from May 7. This move has been promoted by the US Health Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr, who expressed skepticism about water fluoridation.
As per the American Dental Association, this is a move worth criticizing. They said that the ban showed “wanton disregard for the oral health and well-being of their constituents.” The group said that cavities are the most common chronic childhood disease.
“As a father and a dentist, it is disheartening to see that a proven, public health policy, which exists for the greater good of an entire community’s oral health, has been dismantled based on distorted pseudoscience,” said the association’s president, Denver dentist Brett Kessler, as reported by the CNN.
In elsewhere too, including Ohio, South Carolina, and Florida, similar proposals have been made to restrict local governments or water system operators from adding fluoride to water. Whereas such proposed restrictions have been rejected in New Hampshire, Tennessee and North Dakota.
Credits: Instagram & Canva
Kristen Fischer, an American woman living in India who works in web development sparked a new debate. This is between the healthcare systems of two big countries, the United States and India. The woman took to her Instagram @kristenfischer3 with 143K followers and shared a video titled 'Healthcare in India and the USA'. The video garnered over 51.6K views and with many more interactions.
Her video starts with comparing the wait time of a GP. In the US, the average wait time, she mentions is 2 to 4 weeks, whereas in India, it is a walk-in or same-day appointment. She mentions in the caption that in India, healthcare is more accessible and there is an easy to access doctors, medicines, and quality care. She also talks about how easily medicines are accessible in India and over-the-counter medicines could be picked without a prescription.
One of the biggest differences that Kristen highlights is of the wait time for medical consultation. In the US, scheduling an appointment with a GP can lead to even a month of wait time. It can further extend to three months. For elective surgeries or planned and non-emergency surgeries, the wait time could be for as long as six months.
Whereas, if one looks at India, the access is faster. There are appointments, which can be booked within a few days, furthermore, walk-in services are also available in most cases. Elective surgeries are usually performed within one to four weeks in India.
Healthcare in the US is costly. Kristen writes in her caption: "In America, we hardly went to the doctor because it was just so expensive and you had to wait weeks to get in. But I have peace of mind in India knowing that I can go to a doctor any day even for something small because it is affordable.”
It is true, on an average, for a visit to a doctor in America could cost anyone between $150 to $600, which is around 12k to 50k INR. Whereas in India, the consultation cost is between $7 to $17, which could be around 500 to 1,500 INR. The affordability is what ensures that people do not hesitate to reach out to doctors or healthcare professionals when in need.
Not just appointments with doctors, but in the US, the hospitalization costs are also skyrocketing. For one-night hospital stay, the cost is around $3,000, which is somewhere around 2.5 lakhs INR. This makes hospitalisation a financial burden, even for those under insurance.
In India, one day stay at a hospital is around $80, which could be around 6,000 INR.
There are also arguments that the US healthcare system is manageable as it is covered in medical insurance. However, the reality may be different, because the medical insurance too is not quite affordable. The average cost of medical insurance in the US could range somewhere between $800 and $1,500, which could be around 64k to 1.2 lakh INR per month. There are also high premiums.
Whereas in India, the medical insurance is far for affordable, ranging between $23 and $58, around 2k to 5k INR.
While the US is home to the best medical facilities, world-class research and top-tier doctors, it does come at a very high price. However, the Indian healthcare system is a mix of both, private and public hospitals, where experts come from all walks of life. In fact, at this time, many private hospitals too have been technologically equipped and have internationally accredited doctors.
The biggest point to be noted, as Kristen also mentions, is the affordability the Indian healthcare system offers and the understanding of treating medical cases with urgency.
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited