Keto Vs Carnivore Diet (Credit-Canva)
Amidst the constant stream of diet trends, it's really important to prioritize health over quick fixes. Many people will follow diet trends they find on social media and follow it, ignoring how it may affect their health later in life. While eliminating sugary drinks and processed foods can be beneficial, you must remember that you are cutting out a big chunk of macronutrient groups, which can lead to nutritional deficiencies and health problems. Then we have the carnivore diet, an extreme version of the ketogenic diet, which eliminates carbohydrates entirely, relying solely on animal products for sustenance. This approach raises significant concerns regarding heart health.
Having a carnivore diet means complete elimination of carbohydrates, even the ones that have proven health benefits. Many animal products consumed on this diet are high in saturated fat and cholesterol and eliminating plant-based foods which are the primary source of fiber, you are hindering the body's ability to regulate cholesterol and blood pressure. This lack of fiber can also negatively impact gut health, which has broader implications for overall well-being.
We all know that high blood pressure, high cholesterol, diabetes, and obesity are known risk factors for heart disease. While the carnivore diet's restriction of sugar and refined carbohydrates may initially prevent blood sugar spikes, the potential for increased saturated fat and cholesterol intake poses a significant threat. Studies show that increased consumption of red meat and poultry can elevate the risk of high blood pressure in people. Similarly, diets high in saturated fat can raise LDL cholesterol levels, further increasing the risk of heart disease. Therefore, the carnivore diet, while potentially leading to short-term weight loss, may significantly compromise long-term cardiovascular health.
Maintaining heart health doesn't necessitate eliminating meat entirely, but it does require mindful consumption of saturated fat, you must remember that indulging once in a while does not mean you are no longer taking care of yourself, but the end must justify the process, so try eating a controlled amount. Health organizations recommend limiting saturated fat intake to a small percentage of daily calories. This basically translates to a relatively small amount for most individuals.
While saturated fat is a cause of concern, there are other dietary factors that play a crucial role in heart health. Added sugar and sodium can also negatively impact cardiovascular well-being, doctors often discourage people from consuming too much of both as they aid in unhealthy weight gain or high blood pressure. Limiting added sugar intake to a small percentage of daily calories is recommended. Similarly, reducing sodium consumption by substituting processed foods with natural alternatives can contribute significantly to heart health.
From the research and studies, we understand that having a more balanced diet, which includes fiber-rich foods like nuts, fruits, vegetables, and whole grains is essential for maintaining heart health. Try aiming for a daily intake of at least 30 grams of fiber and you will see how it can significantly benefit cardiovascular function. Another thing that is equally important is incorporating regular physical activity. Finding enjoyable forms of movement, whether it is a social sports or activities you find pleasurable like dancing, can make exercise a sustainable and positive part of a heart-healthy lifestyle, people often find that dragging yourself to places you do not like does not work long term. With this holistic approach of combining a balanced diet with regular exercise, you will get the best protection for long-term cardiovascular well-being.
Credit: AI
A particular brand of granola marketed for breastfeeding mothers has been recalled in the US over concerns that it could be contaminated with Salmonella.
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said The Hampton Grocer, Inc. recalled around 8-ounce packages of its Lacnola Lactation Granola after being alerted by an ingredient supplier about possible contamination. No illnesses linked to the granola have been reported so far.
The issue traces back to organic moringa powder, an ingredient that is used in the recalled granola. The Hampton Grocer was notified by its supplier, Food to Live, that a sample of its Organic SuperGreens Powder Mix had tested positive for Salmonella. The same supplier’s moringa powder is used in the affected Lacnola batches.
US FDA said that neither the finished Lacnola granola nor the specific moringa powder used in it had tested positive for Salmonella at the time of the recall. The exact source of possible contamination remains under investigation. The company has suspended production while the investigation continues.
The recall applies specifically to 8-ounce pink stand-up pouches of Lacnola Lactation Granola with UPC 850035324554. Consumers should check the lot information printed on the back of the package. The affected products are:
The granola was sold nationwide through mail orders on The Hampton Grocer’s website and through Amazon between October 21, 2025 and August 12, 2026.
Also read: New Less-Toxic Radiation May Kill Cancer In Under 1 Second: All About FLASH Proton Therapy
Salmonella is a kind of bacteria that can cause an infection called salmonellosis. It causes food-borne illnesses. In otherwise healthy people, this infection can commonly lead to symptoms like diarrhoea, fever, nausea, vomiting and stomach or abdominal pain. Symptoms can sometimes become severe, particularly when the infection spreads beyond the intestine.
The FDA notes that young children, older people and those with weak immunity are at greater risk of serious illness if they get infected by salmonella.
For breastfeeding mothers, the recall is particularly concerning because the product is specifically marketed as a lactation granola. However, the recall does not mean that Salmonella from contaminated food automatically passes into breast milk.
The immediate concern is the mother’s exposure to the contaminated granola and the possibility of foodborne illness. This could cause the mother as well as the newborn to get sick.
If you have Lacnola Lactation Granola at home, check the lot code and expiration date before eating it. If it matches either recalled lot, the FDA advises consumers to dispose of the product and contact the place of purchase for a refund.
The FDA says no illnesses have been reported in connection with the recalled granola to date. The recall is a precautionary measure while authorities and the company investigate the contamination.
Credit: iStock
Love your daily coffee but worried about bone health as you age? A new study suggests that drinking more than five cups of coffee a day may be linked to lower bone density in older women, while tea drinkers showed slightly higher hip bone density.
The findings, published in Nutrients, offer a closer look at how two of the world’s most popular beverages may be associated with bone health in older women. Importantly, moderate coffee consumption was not associated with overall harm to bone health.
“While calcium and vitamin D remain cornerstones of bone health, what’s in your cup could play a role too. For older women, enjoying a daily cup of tea may be more than a comforting ritual; it could be a small step toward stronger bones,” said Enwu Liu, Adjunct Associate Professor from the College of Medicine and Public Health at Flinders University.
Researchers at Flinders University in Australia analyzed data from 9,704 women aged 65 and older who were followed for about 10 years.
The researchers repeatedly assessed how much coffee and tea the women consumed and measured bone mineral density (BMD) at the total hip and femoral neck — areas closely linked to fracture risk.
They found that moderate coffee consumption — around two to three cups a day — was not associated with overall harm to bone health.
However, drinking more than five cups of coffee a day was linked to lower BMD, suggesting that very high coffee intake may have negative effects on bone health. The association was also stronger among women with higher lifetime alcohol consumption.
Importantly, the researchers found no significant overall association between coffee consumption and BMD. The potential link with lower BMD emerged when they examined very high coffee intake.
Tea showed a different pattern. Women who drank tea had slightly higher total hip BMD than women who did not drink tea. The difference was small but statistically significant.
The researchers also found that the association between tea consumption and higher bone density was more pronounced among women with obesity.
Read More: Can Drinking Coffee Make You Leaner, Healthier? Study Decodes The Link
Ryan Yan Liu, co-author of the study, explained that compounds called catechins, which are abundant in tea, may promote bone formation and slow bone breakdown.
Caffeine found in coffee, meanwhile, has been shown in laboratory studies to interfere with calcium absorption and bone metabolism. However, the researchers noted that these effects are small and can be offset by adding milk.
Not necessarily. The researchers stressed that the differences observed were modest and do not justify dramatic changes to an individual’s daily habits.
“While moderate coffee drinking appears safe, very high consumption may not be ideal, especially for women who drink alcohol,” said Liu.
The findings also do not prove that coffee causes bone loss or that tea prevents osteoporosis. The study found associations between beverage consumption and bone mineral density in older women.
For women concerned about bone health, the researchers emphasized that calcium and vitamin D remain important.
The study suggests that what you drink may also play a small role — but there is no need to swap coffee for gallons of tea.
Credit: iStock
Vitamin D, better known as the sunshine vitamin, is not only important for bone health but also plays a role in maintaining muscle and cardiovascular function.
An animal study led by researchers at the ICMR-National Institute of Nutrition (ICMR-NIN), Hyderabad, found that Vitamin D3 was more effective than Vitamin D2 in maintaining and restoring skeletal muscle and heart function in male rats.
Vitamin D occurs naturally in two forms: Vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) and Vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol). Vitamin D3 is produced in the skin following exposure to sunlight and is also obtained from animal-based foods such as eggs, fish and organ meats, as well as supplements.
Vitamin D2 is derived from wild, cultivated or sun-dried mushrooms, UV-B-irradiated yeast, plant-based sources and some dietary supplements.
Amid increasing vitamin D deficiency, both forms are used for food fortification. However, D2 is preferred in some countries because of widespread vegetarianism and among people following strict vegan diets.
Also read: India Gets Its First Plant-Based Vitamin D3: What You Need to Know
Researchers compared the effects of Vitamin D2 and Vitamin D3 on skeletal muscle and cardiac parameters in rats during both maintenance and recovery from vitamin D deficiency.
The study used weaning male Sprague-Dawley rats, which were given diets containing Vitamin D2, Vitamin D3, a combination of both forms, or a vitamin D-deficient diet.
Researchers assessed several parameters, including body composition, muscle strength, skeletal muscle structure and metabolism, along with markers associated with cardiac function.

The study found that Vitamin D3 produced greater improvements in muscle mass, muscle fibre size and grip strength compared with Vitamin D2.
Vitamin D3 also showed stronger effects on markers associated with muscle development and energy metabolism.
Similar differences were observed in cardiac parameters, with Vitamin D3 showing greater effects on markers related to cardiac contractility and metabolism.
The differences between the two forms were particularly pronounced during the recovery phase following vitamin D deficiency, according to the researchers.
Dr Ayesha Ismail, Scientist F at ICMR-NIN and corresponding author of the study, said both forms were effective in improving calcium-related parameters, but Vitamin D2 was less effective on several measures linked to muscle and heart structure and energy metabolism.
“Although both forms of vitamin D were effective in improving calcium-related parameters, vitamin D2 was less effective than vitamin D3 in several parameters related to muscle and heart structure and energy metabolism,” Ismail said, ANI news agency reported.
Read More: Sweetener In Sugar-Free Gum Linked To 57% Higher Heart Attack And Stroke Risk: What Is Xylitol?
Dr Bharati Kulkarni, Director, ICMR-NIN, stressed that further research would be required before drawing conclusions about the effects of the two forms of vitamin D in humans.
“Further studies are needed to establish the effects of the two forms of vitamin D on skeletal and extra-skeletal functions and their implications for supplementation and fortification programs,” she told ANI.
The findings suggest that Vitamin D3 may have stronger effects than Vitamin D2 on skeletal muscle and cardiac function. However, the study was conducted in male rats, and whether the same effects occur in humans remains to be established.
The researchers said the study provides additional evidence of differences between Vitamin D2 and D3 beyond their established roles in calcium regulation and bone health.
© $2026 Times Horizon Private Limited