Birthdays are exciting for everyone. There's celebration, a cake, and balloons. But what if it goes wrong? This is what happened with Giang Pham, from Vietnam, who was celebrating her 33rd birthday on February 14, when a hydrogen balloon in her hand touched the flame from the candle on the cake and exploded on her face.

This incident was also captured on camera. The footage clearly shows how the balloon blew up as soon as it touched the flame. Her friends were shocked and can be heard gasping in the background as they saw this.

In the days following the incident, she also shared photos on her Instagram showing her bandaged face, and revealed the first-degree burns on her hand and second-degree burns on her face. However, the good news was that her vision was unaffected, though for her face to recover, it would take months.

She is now also warning others about the risks of using highly inflammable hydrogen balloons. The other alternative could be a helium balloon, which you could fly higher and they remain on the ceiling.

Health Update

She revealed that her doctor estimated up to six months for her skin to recover. She would still have to go to the hospital for dressing and treatment. Another such case happened with a woman named Tine from Australia, when on her son's 7th birthday, the balloon exploded and "shook her house". Her son was burned in the forearm.

Such incidents happen because decorators want to save the cost by replacing helium with hydrogen, which is highly inflammable.

In Healing

Giang shared that she experienced second-degree burn on her face and first-degree burn on her hands. As per John Hopkins Medicine, first degree burns affect only the epidermis, or the outer layer of skin. The burn site becomes red, painful, dry, however, there are no blisters. A mild sunburn could be an example of such a burn. This is also called superficial burns.

Whereas, second degree burns involve the epidermis and part of the dermis layer of the skin. The burn site appears red, blistered and could also be swollen and painful. This is also known as partial thickness burn.

Then comes the third degree burns, also known as full thickness burn. This destroys the epidermis and dermis and could also damage the underlying bones, muscles, and tendons. However, when the bones and muscles are burned, it could be referred to as a fourth degree burn. The burn sit appears white or charred and there is no feeling in the area since the nerve endings are destroyed.

How burns are treated?

The right way to treat a burn depends on its depth and how much of the body it covers. While minor, superficial burns can be managed at home, deeper or larger burns may need medical attention. Keep these essential guidelines in mind:

Do:

• Remove the source of the burn immediately – For example, take off clothing soaked in hot liquid to prevent further damage.
• Run cool water over the burn – This helps soothe the skin, except in cases of certain chemical burns.
• Keep the burn clean and protected – Cover it with a clean, non-stick bandage when possible.
• Seek medical help – If the burn is deeper than a superficial layer, larger than your hand, or full-thickness, see a doctor.

Don’t:

• Use home remedies like bleach or butter – These can make the burn worse.
• Apply ointments or creams on deep burns – They can trap heat and worsen the injury.
• Put ice on the burn – It can cause more damage to the skin.
• Pop blisters – This increases the risk of infection.

Knowing these simple steps can make a big difference in burn care and healing.

About one in 20 adults in the US hospitalized with firearm injuries develop bacterial infections, according to a study.

The findings, published in JAMA Network Open as a research letter, showed that most infections occur during the initial hospitalization rather than after patients return home.

While firearm injuries are a major public health concern in the US, very little research has examined infectious complications that can occur after treatment.

"Firearm injury is a recognized risk for bacterial infection, but no large studies have described how often such infections occur and which patients are most at risk," said Jonathan D. Baghdadi, associate professor of epidemiology and public health at the University of Maryland School of Medicine (UMSOM).

Most Infections Emerged Early

To better understand the risks after gunshot injuries, researchers analyzed data from 24,024 adults hospitalized with firearm injuries at 323 hospitals across the country between January 2019 and May 2021.

The study found that 1,236 patients—about 5%—developed a bacterial infection. Most cases occurred during the initial hospitalization, with only 1.3% occurring during the 90-day follow-up period.

Researchers also found that patients who underwent surgeries involving the head, neck, spine, liver or lower abdomen faced the highest risk of developing bacterial infections.

Who Faced the Greatest Risk?

The risk was more common among patients undergoing head, neck, spine or lower-abdominal surgery were especially vulnerable to bacterial infections.

The team found that most commonly identified pathogens patients were Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus and enterococci. These pathogens are known to acquire dangerous resistance, creating major challenges in hospitals and communities worldwide

Antibiotic exposure among patients who did not develop infections was generally low, which researchers said reflects current recommendations to limit preventive antibiotic use when there is no bacterial infection.

Bacterial infection was not independently linked to a higher risk of death among patients who survived at least one night in the hospital.

Study Limitations

The authors noted that the research relied on administrative hospital data and that complete follow-up information may not have been available for every patient.

Nonetheless, the large national dataset provided an opportunity to evaluate infection risk across a broad and diverse patient population.

"Recovery from firearm injuries can be complicated. Although our study focused on mortality, infections can impact recovery in multiple ways, contributing to long-term pain and disability," Baghdadi said.

"By identifying the patients most likely to develop these complications, we hope this work contributes to more informed clinical decision-making and ultimately better outcomes for patients."

Baghdadi hopes that by developing a definition to identify patients with bacterial infection after firearm injury using observational and administrative datasets, and demonstrating how to apply it, other researchers will use the approach to conduct studies targeting more specific clinical questions.

A group of leading Indian doctors and public health experts has urged the Centre to impose strict restrictions on junk food advertising and make warning labels mandatory on packaged foods high in fat, sugar and salt.

The appeal comes amid growing concerns over obesity and diet-related non-communicable diseases in India.

The experts have asked Centre to immediately implement recommendations from the Economic Survey 2025-26, including a “watershed” ban on advertisements for high-fat, high-sugar and high-salt (HFSS) foods and ultra-processed foods (UPFs) between 6 am and 11 pm across media platforms.

The public statement was endorsed by several prominent health experts, including former WHO chief scientist Dr Soumya Swaminathan, founder of the Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI), Dr K Srinath Reddy; paediatrician Dr Narender Arora; chairman of Dr Mohan's Diabetes Specialities Centre, Dr V Mohan; former AIIMS director Dr Randeep Guleria; endocrinologists Dr Anoop Misra and Dr Ambrish Mithal; cardiologist Dr Gurpreet S Wander; diabetologist Dr Shashank Joshi; public health policy expert Dr Chandrakant Lahariya; cardiologist Dr TS Kler; and Dr Arun Gupta, convener of Nutrition Advocacy in Public Interest (NAPi).

Why Experts Are Seeking A Ban On Junk Food Advertising?

The experts argue that the problem does not lie in simply what people eat, but how unhealthy foods are marketed.

Junk food advertisements frequently use celebrities, influencers, sports sponsorships, cartoon characters and promotional offers to make products more attractive, particularly to children and adolescents, who get influenced easily.

“We are concerned that these junk foods are increasingly promoted through persuasive and misleading advertising strategies that encourage overconsumption,” the doctors said in their joint statement.

Dr Arun Gupta, convenor of Nutrition Advocacy in Public Interest (NAPi), has previously warned that marketing plays a major role in driving consumption of unhealthy foods. He has argued that India’s current regulatory framework is not strong enough to stop misleading advertising of HFSS foods.

Also read: Why FSSAI Seized 18,000 Boxes Of Diageo Whisky, Vodka Bottles

Can Warning Labels Help?

The doctors have also called for mandatory warning labels on the front of unhealthy packaged foods.

Unlike a rating system that gives a product an overall score, warning labels are designed to immediately tell consumers when a food is high in sugar, salt or unhealthy fats.

The experts basically want that consumers should not have to turn the packet around, decode a long nutrition table or interpret marketing claims before understanding what they are buying. Dr K Srinath Reddy has previously backed the idea that nutritional information to be translated easily and quickly as soon as a consumer picks up a food product.

Children At The Centre Of The Debate

Also read: No More 'Buy 1 Get 1 Free': After UK, Northern Ireland Restricts Promotion Of Unhealthy Foods To Tackle Obesity

The experts have specifically called for restrictions on celebrity endorsements, influencer marketing, cartoon characters, child-directed promotions, buy-one-get-one-free offers and sponsorship of schools and sports activities by unhealthy food brands.

They cited NFHS-6 data that shows nearly one in three women and more than one in four men aged 15-49 are overweight or obese.

“Protecting children from the harmful impact of junk food marketing is a fundamental public health, child-rights, and preventive healthcare priority,” Dr Gupta and the other signatories said in their letter to the Centre.

The appeal comes ahead of a Supreme Court hearing on a public interest litigation concerning warning labels, putting the debate over how India regulates unhealthy food marketing.

Maharashtra Bans Junk Food Sale Outside Schools

Also read: No Junk Food Near Schools! Maharashtra FDA Bans Sale Of Foods & Drinks High In Fat, Salt & Sugar

This comes after Maharashtra Food And Drug Administration (FDA) has taken a significant step towards promoting healthy eating habits in children.

FDA commissioner Tukaram Mundhe recently announced that foods and drinks high in fat, sugar, and salt should not be sold within 50 metres of school premises.

"Within school premises and up to 50 metres from the school compound, the sale, advertisement and free distribution of high fat, salt and sugar (HFSS) food items is completely banned by the FDA. It will be implemented strictly," Mundhe said.

The recent ban covers popular junk food items like vada pav, samosas, deep-fried snacks, chips, cold drinks, sugary beverages, chocolates and ice cream.

Mundhe said the state government had issued a compliance order on July 27 to enforce food safety and nutritional standards across educational institutions.

He also said that the move would affect nearly two crore students studying in around 1.08 lakh schools in Maharashtra.

Amid an ongoing food safety overhaul by the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI), around 18,000 boxes of Diageo whisky and vodka bottles have been seized from the company's unit in Bengaluru.

Diageo is the world's largest spirits maker and owns brands including Johnnie Walker, Baileys and Captain Morgan.

News agency Reuters, citing government sources, reported that the action was linked to the alleged lack of markings showing that the bottles were made using safe, food-grade recycled plastic.

Confirming the regulatory action, Diageo India said some of its bottles "have been quarantined by authorities until further direction."

What Did FSSAI Find?

According to a government memo, the FSSAI inspectors found that United Spirits' Bengaluru factory had recycled liquor bottles that carried only markings showing they were made from polyethylene terephthalate (PET). A second government memo stated that the bottles should have carried a government-mandated recycled PET symbol indicating that the material was food-grade.

"This raised serious food safety, misleading and misbranding compliance concerns regarding the safety of finished alcoholic beverages for consumers," the memo said. The seizure was made in the interests of public health, it added.

Which Bottles Were Seized?

Also read: From Liquor to Dabur to VKC Nuts, FSSAI Crackdown Puts Food Safety in Focus: Why It Matters

While most large bottles of Diageo drinks are made of glass, the action focused on plastic bottles used to sell the products in smaller quantities, typically 180 milliliters.

The seizure included:

• Products worth around $1.6 million

• Plastic material

• More than half a dozen brands, including DSP Black Deluxe Whisky

• Smirnoff Zesty Lime Triple Distilled Flavored Vodka

• VAT 69 blended Scotch whisky

What Did Diageo Say?

Diageo India stated that the liquor bottles were sourced from a recycler approved by FSSAI, and that mandatory tests had been conducted by the suppliers.

"Our products are completely safe for consumption ... We are engaging with FSSAI for further direction on this matter," Diageo India unit United Spirits told Reuters. The FSSAI did not respond to Reuters' questions about the seizure.

Diageo Faces Wider Scrutiny

Read More: Why Has FSSAI Banned The Sale Of Dabur India's Ghee, Honey & Other Products?

The latest seizure comes after FSSAI banned the sale of select whisky and rum products from major liquor companies, including Diageo India's United Spirits, after finding artificial or "nature-identical" flavoring that allegedly violates Indian food standards.

The affected products include:

• United Spirits' Antiquity Blue

• Royal Challenge Whisky, manufactured in Madhya

• Inbrew's Bagpiper Deluxe

• Old Cask Deluxe XXX

• Three variants of Old Monk, produced by Mohan Rocky Springwater in Maharashtra

FSSAI said laboratory tests found that certain products manufactured by United Spirits, Inbrew Beverages and Mohan Rocky Springwater contained external artificial or nature-identical flavoring substances intended to recreate the taste and aroma of whisky or rum, instead of relying on traditional production methods.

According to the regulator, natural flavoring substances are permitted in alcoholic beverages, but manufacturers cannot add whisky flavor to whisky or rum flavor to rum.

"There is no internationally recognized manufacturing practice whereby rum flavor is added to rum or whisky flavor is added to whisky," FSSAI said in its statement.

The regulator added that these practices could bypass proper maturation and reduce reliance on ingredients traditionally used to develop flavor, including molasses, malt and grapes

FSSAI classified the tested products as "sub-standard due to the presence of external artificial or nature-identical flavors in the product."

FSSAI Steps Up Food Safety Checks

The food standards regulator has stepped up enforcement across packaged foods, edible oils, sweeteners and high-caffeine beverages, energy drink makers, including PepsiCo, with the drive gathering pace since July.

In recent weeks, FSSAI has acted against or scrutinized products and companies over misleading claims, hygiene and food-safety violations, non-compliant ingredients, labelling issues and failure to meet prescribed standards.