Birthday Celebrations Gone Wrong When A Hydrogen Balloon Exploded, Leaving The 33-year-Old Birthday Girl With First And Second Degree Burns

Updated Feb 26, 2025 | 11:00 PM IST

SummaryThe right way to treat a burn depends on its depth and how much of the body it covers. While minor, superficial burns can be managed at home, deeper or larger burns may need medical attention. For Giang Pham, whose hydrogen balloon exploded, it will take around around 6 months to fully recover.
Giang Pham's birthday celebrations gone wrong with hydrogen balloon exploding on her face and hand

Credits: Instagram

Birthdays are exciting for everyone. There's celebration, a cake, and balloons. But what if it goes wrong? This is what happened with Giang Pham, from Vietnam, who was celebrating her 33rd birthday on February 14, when a hydrogen balloon in her hand touched the flame from the candle on the cake and exploded on her face.

This incident was also captured on camera. The footage clearly shows how the balloon blew up as soon as it touched the flame. Her friends were shocked and can be heard gasping in the background as they saw this.

In the days following the incident, she also shared photos on her Instagram showing her bandaged face, and revealed the first-degree burns on her hand and second-degree burns on her face. However, the good news was that her vision was unaffected, though for her face to recover, it would take months.

She is now also warning others about the risks of using highly inflammable hydrogen balloons. The other alternative could be a helium balloon, which you could fly higher and they remain on the ceiling.

Health Update

She revealed that her doctor estimated up to six months for her skin to recover. She would still have to go to the hospital for dressing and treatment. Another such case happened with a woman named Tine from Australia, when on her son's 7th birthday, the balloon exploded and "shook her house". Her son was burned in the forearm.

Such incidents happen because decorators want to save the cost by replacing helium with hydrogen, which is highly inflammable.

In Healing

Giang shared that she experienced second-degree burn on her face and first-degree burn on her hands. As per John Hopkins Medicine, first degree burns affect only the epidermis, or the outer layer of skin. The burn site becomes red, painful, dry, however, there are no blisters. A mild sunburn could be an example of such a burn. This is also called superficial burns.

Whereas, second degree burns involve the epidermis and part of the dermis layer of the skin. The burn site appears red, blistered and could also be swollen and painful. This is also known as partial thickness burn.

Then comes the third degree burns, also known as full thickness burn. This destroys the epidermis and dermis and could also damage the underlying bones, muscles, and tendons. However, when the bones and muscles are burned, it could be referred to as a fourth degree burn. The burn sit appears white or charred and there is no feeling in the area since the nerve endings are destroyed.

How burns are treated?

The right way to treat a burn depends on its depth and how much of the body it covers. While minor, superficial burns can be managed at home, deeper or larger burns may need medical attention. Keep these essential guidelines in mind:

Do:

  • Remove the source of the burn immediately – For example, take off clothing soaked in hot liquid to prevent further damage.
  • Run cool water over the burn – This helps soothe the skin, except in cases of certain chemical burns.
  • Keep the burn clean and protected – Cover it with a clean, non-stick bandage when possible.
  • Seek medical help – If the burn is deeper than a superficial layer, larger than your hand, or full-thickness, see a doctor.

Don’t:

  • Use home remedies like bleach or butter – These can make the burn worse.
  • Apply ointments or creams on deep burns – They can trap heat and worsen the injury.
  • Put ice on the burn – It can cause more damage to the skin.
  • Pop blisters – This increases the risk of infection.

Knowing these simple steps can make a big difference in burn care and healing.

End of Article

Medical Miracle: World First Frozen Testicular Implant Gives ‘Infertile’ UK Man Hope of Fatherhood

Updated May 5, 2026 | 11:01 PM IST

SummaryAt the age of 9, Nathan Crawford underwent radiotherapy and chemotherapy to shrink his tumor. Before these, his surgeons, in a keyhole surgery, removed and froze a wedge of testicular tissue. Now at the age of 27, the reimplanted tissue has produced sperm, raising hopes for his fatherhood.
Medical Miracle: World First Frozen Testicular Implant Gives ‘Infertile’ UK Man Hope of Fatherhood

Credit: iStock

Nathan Crawford from the UK was just 9-years-old when his testicular tissue was frozen, before undergoing chemotherapy for his brain tumor.

About 16 years later, the cryopreserved immature testicular tissue was reintroduced into his body, which triggered sperm cell production and restored his fertility, according to researchers from the Vrije Universiteit Brussel.

“This is an important step in further scientific research to preserve the fertility of children with cancer or other blood diseases for the future. While the procedure is specifically designed to restore fertility, we cannot at this time guarantee that it will be successful or that patients can go on to have children. This treatment offers lots of perspectives for these young adults. They now have options that they did not have until recently,” said Dr Veerle Vloeberghs, part of the novel trial and staff member at Brussels IVF.

What Had Happened To Nathan

Nathan, now 27-years-old, had a type of tumor called a glioma, which develops from the glial cells that support the nerve cells of the brain, The Guardian reported. The tumor was so close to vital brain tissue that surgeons were unable to remove it without causing serious damage to important brain functions.

He underwent radiotherapy and chemotherapy to shrink his tumor, before which surgeons at the John Radcliffe hospital in Oxford in a keyhole surgery removed and froze a wedge of testicular tissue, with the aim that it is one day re-implanted into Nathan.

How Is The Testicular Tissue Preserved?

While Chemotherapy and radiation therapy are lifesaving they can destroy testicular stem cells, the precursors of sperm cells in boys who undergo radical treatments before starting puberty. As it can affect their fertility, preventively removing and freezing testicular tissue is an option pioneered by UZ Brussel.

In 2002, UZ Brussel became the first hospital worldwide to initiate a clinical fertility preservation program for young boys suffering from cancer or diseases of the blood, bone marrow or lymph nodes.

Since then, the hospital has frozen testicular tissue fragments of 141 boys.

The tissue is preserved in liquid nitrogen at -196°C.

Prepubescent boys do not yet produce sperm cells. The removed tissue contains stem cells that would normally produce sperm after starting puberty.

"While the procedure is specifically designed to restore fertility, we cannot at this time guarantee that it will be successful or that patients can go on to have children,” Dr Vloeberghs said.

How Was The Testicular tissue Implanted

The Guardian reported that in 2025, four tissue fragments were grafted back into the remaining testicle and four under the skin of the scrotum.

After a year inside the body, the grafts were removed and analysed in the laboratory. The results are published in a preprint paper, which is yet to be peer reviewed.

Two of the grafts from inside the testicle had produced mature sperm, which was collected and frozen.

Because the tissue fragments are not directly connected to the sperm duct, the researchers do not expect sperm cells to naturally find their way into the semen.

“This is a huge finding,” Prof Ellen Goossens, of the Vrije Universiteit Brussel, who led the trial was quoted as saying. “Many more people will have hope that they can have biological children. It’s great to see for the patients for whom we already have tissue banked.”

End of Article

Does Influenza D Virus Really Pose A Risk To Humans? Expert Explains

Updated May 5, 2026 | 08:00 PM IST

SummaryUS ​CDC’s January 2026 report stated that “influenza D has shown to have considerable potential for causing future human epidemics, but diagnostics and surveillance for the viruses are lacking”.
Does Influenza D Virus Really Pose A Risk To Humans? Expert Explains

Credit: AI generated image

A new research paper published in the PNAS Journal triggered concerns over the potential risk of influenza D spilling over into humans.

Although primarily found in livestock such as cattle and swine, this virus has been increasingly studied due to evidence of exposure among agricultural workers.

A key concern raised was that the influenza D virus triggers a relatively weak early immune response in human respiratory cells.

However, to understand whether it is just a hype or a real concern, HealthandMe spoke to Dr. Rajeev Jayadevan, Ex-President of IMA Cochin and Convener of the Research Cell, Kerala.

“So far, this virus has not been a major cause of respiratory disease in man, unlike other types of Influenza viruses like H1N1 and H3N2 of the Influenza A family. It is true that studies have demonstrated antibodies against this virus among cattle farmers, which is consistent with its ability to infect species other than cattle,” Dr. Jayadevan said.

He noted that the virus may not be an “imminent threat” to humankind as feared.

“So far, the signals are that this virus remains primarily a cattle pathogen, which doesn’t pose an imminent threat to man, unlike other types of influenza viruses”.

What is the Influenza D Virus?

Influenza D is one of four types of influenza viruses and belongs to the Orthomyxoviridae family. Unlike the more familiar influenza A and B viruses that cause seasonal flu in humans, influenza D has primarily been detected in animals, particularly cattle and pigs.

According to the US CDC, the virus was first identified in 2011. It has since been found across multiple species, including livestock and wildlife, including camels, deer, giraffes, kangaroos, llamas, wallabies, and wildebeests.

It is not currently known to cause illness in humans, but has had a spill over in different animal species — more recently in poultry.

CDC’s January 2026 report stated that “influenza D has shown to have considerable potential for causing future human epidemics, but diagnostics and surveillance for the viruses are lacking”.

Also read: Can A Common Cold Virus Save You From Cancer? New Study Claims So

What Did The PNAS Study find?

Researchers investigated multiple influenza D virus isolates collected from livestock between 2011 and 2020 to assess their ability to infect human airway systems.

The paper demonstrated that the virus is capable of infecting human respiratory cells and was also adept at switching off the interferon-based ‘alarm systems’ of the cell.

This means that the virus may spread silently and efficiently, but without causing significant symptoms, Dr. Jayadevan said.

Importantly, the findings suggest that only small genetic changes might be needed for influenza D virus to achieve more sustained transmission in humans, although this has not yet been observed.

Read More: Hantavirus Outbreak: WHO Flags 6 Suspected Cases; How The Rare Rodent-Borne Virus Spreads

H5N1 Bird Flu: A More Deadly Threat

Dr. Jayadevan told HealthandMe that a bigger concern for humans besides the commonly circulating human Influenza A and B viruses is the avian influenza (bird flu) virus H5N1.

H5N1 spreads among birds and carries a very high death rate whenever it infects humans.

“Fortunately, this bird flu virus isn’t able to easily spread from person to person, but ongoing mutations could potentially change that,” the expert said.

End of Article

Can A Common Cold Virus Save You From Cancer? New Study Claims So

Updated May 5, 2026 | 04:03 PM IST

SummaryRSV can be fatal—but according to a new study, it may prevent breast cancer cells from spreading to your lungs.
RSV

RSV can lead to severe infections and pneumonia. (Photo credit: AI generated)

When it comes to living with a common cold, the infection is not as simple as it sounds. There are headaches; you may feel irritable and may even sometimes struggle to sleep properly. A blocked or runny nose may even put you in awkward situations in a social setting; however, a new study says that catching a common respiratory virus could stop breast cancer cells from taking hold of your lungs. Researchers at the Francis Crick Institute in London and Imperial College London have discovered that RSV can benefit cancer patients to a great extent. Find out how.

How does RSV lower cancer risk?

The study, published in the PNAS journal, found that scientists who conducted tests on mice found that those who fought off RSV infection developed relatively fewer tumours in the lungs, the most common spot for breast cancer cells to spread. When breast cancer spreads to other body parts, it is known as secondary breast cancer. Scientists say that RSV infections have this effect when lung cells detect RSV-like viruses. They then produce immune cells to stop the virus from taking over. This makes it more difficult for cancer cells to form new tumours by taking control in the lungs.

For the study, cancer biologists introduced breast cancer cells to mice that had recently experienced an RSV infection. They developed fewer tumours (not smaller) in the lungs compared to mice that were not living with RSV infection. The infection also increases levels of Galectin-9, a protein that is responsible for enhancing the immune response to the virus and also for stopping cancer cells from taking over.

What do previous studies indicate?

Previous research shows that 60 per cent of stage four breast cancer patients developed tumours in their lungs. At present, the five-year survival rate stands at 30 per cent. Researchers also claim that the findings could pave the way for new treatments that may prevent tumours from spreading. However, it does not mean that RSV infections will be used for cancer treatment. Researchers noted that they can find ways to make the lungs more resistant to the successful seeding of cancer cells that have become metastatic. Experts say that a drug could be developed to replicate the effects observed in mice. Studies in humans can also help confirm whether the effect can be replicated.

Is RSV common?

RSV is common, but it can be fatal, especially in younger children. The virus results in thousands of hospitalisations every year and may lead to serious complications such as lung infections and pneumonia. The virus is a leading cause of death among babies in the UK, especially during winter. It is also expected to result in the deaths of 8,000 adults during the same period. The infection can put strain on a patient’s heart, causing organs to fail.

End of Article