Credits: Instagram
Birthdays are exciting for everyone. There's celebration, a cake, and balloons. But what if it goes wrong? This is what happened with Giang Pham, from Vietnam, who was celebrating her 33rd birthday on February 14, when a hydrogen balloon in her hand touched the flame from the candle on the cake and exploded on her face.
This incident was also captured on camera. The footage clearly shows how the balloon blew up as soon as it touched the flame. Her friends were shocked and can be heard gasping in the background as they saw this.
In the days following the incident, she also shared photos on her Instagram showing her bandaged face, and revealed the first-degree burns on her hand and second-degree burns on her face. However, the good news was that her vision was unaffected, though for her face to recover, it would take months.
She is now also warning others about the risks of using highly inflammable hydrogen balloons. The other alternative could be a helium balloon, which you could fly higher and they remain on the ceiling.
She revealed that her doctor estimated up to six months for her skin to recover. She would still have to go to the hospital for dressing and treatment. Another such case happened with a woman named Tine from Australia, when on her son's 7th birthday, the balloon exploded and "shook her house". Her son was burned in the forearm.
Such incidents happen because decorators want to save the cost by replacing helium with hydrogen, which is highly inflammable.
Giang shared that she experienced second-degree burn on her face and first-degree burn on her hands. As per John Hopkins Medicine, first degree burns affect only the epidermis, or the outer layer of skin. The burn site becomes red, painful, dry, however, there are no blisters. A mild sunburn could be an example of such a burn. This is also called superficial burns.
Whereas, second degree burns involve the epidermis and part of the dermis layer of the skin. The burn site appears red, blistered and could also be swollen and painful. This is also known as partial thickness burn.
Then comes the third degree burns, also known as full thickness burn. This destroys the epidermis and dermis and could also damage the underlying bones, muscles, and tendons. However, when the bones and muscles are burned, it could be referred to as a fourth degree burn. The burn sit appears white or charred and there is no feeling in the area since the nerve endings are destroyed.
The right way to treat a burn depends on its depth and how much of the body it covers. While minor, superficial burns can be managed at home, deeper or larger burns may need medical attention. Keep these essential guidelines in mind:
Knowing these simple steps can make a big difference in burn care and healing.
Credit: iStock
The Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Bill, 2026, passed by both Houses of Parliament, marks a significant step towards decriminalizing the health sector by amending certain provisions and boosting compliance.
The Union Health Ministry said that the Bill reflects the Government’s commitment to fostering a trust-based governance framework and ensuring proportionate regulation by reducing the compliance burden on individuals and businesses.
The reforms involving 23 Ministries rationalized over 1,000 offences across 79 Central Acts. These are aimed at helping advance Ease of Doing Business and Ease of Living across sectors.
It makes a key shift from criminal penalties to civil penalties as well as introduces adjudication mechanisms. The amendments ensure consistency, predictability, and proportionality in enforcement, the Ministry said.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi called the passing of the Jan Vishwas Bill by the Parliament "a matter of immense delight".
"This Bill strengthens a trust-based framework that empowers our citizens. It marks the end of rules and regulations that are outdated. At the same time, it ensures speedy disposal of cases, reduces litigation burden with decriminalization," PM Modi added.
Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 -- to substitute imprisonment with financial penalties and to introduce a structured adjudication mechanism.
Pharmacy Act, 1948 -- to modernize penalty provisions and enhance accountability through increased financial penalties for non-compliance.
Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 -- to strengthen enforcement while ensuring that penalties are proportionate to the nature of the offence.
Clinical Establishments (Registration and Regulation) Act, 2010 - to emphasize monetary penalties for non-compliance, particularly in cases where deficiencies do not pose immediate risks to patient safety.
National Commission for Allied and Healthcare Professions Act, 2021 -- to ensure compliance with professional standards and regulatory requirements, with penalties designed to deter violations while maintaining proportionality.
The Bill introduces a civil penalty framework to reduce the burden on courts, minimize layers of litigation, and enable faster resolution of minor compliance issues.

In the case of cosmetics, minor violations (other than spurious or adulterated) will not require court intervention and can instead be addressed through a civil penalty framework.
Further, violations such as non-maintenance of documents or non-submission of information, which were earlier punishable through court-imposed fines or imprisonment, can now be adjudicated through this civil penalty mechanism.
For the first time, the Act provides for the appointment of adjudicating authorities by the Central Government and State Governments, along with a defined process involving issuance of show cause notices, provision for personal hearing, and an appellate mechanism.
Union Health Minister JP Nadda noted that the Jan Vishwas Bill, "aims to remove outdated laws, reduce unnecessary legal burdens, and create a system that responds faster to people’s needs".
"These reforms will streamline operations for Indian medical devices manufacturers, enhance global competitiveness, and align with international best practices, ultimately benefiting patients and healthcare delivery across the country," Rajiv Nath, Forum Coordinator of The Association of Indian Medical Devices Industry (AiMeD).
Credit: Canva
The US Food and Drug Administration has recalled over three million eye drops in the country over safety concerns.
The 3,111,072 products were manufactured by California-based K C Pharmaceuticals and were sold under names such as “Dry Eye Relief Eye Drops,” “Sterile Eye Drops,” and “Artificial Tears Sterile Lubricant Eye Drops,” according to the FDA notice.
K C Pharmaceuticals made the voluntary recall of the eye drops in early March.
The eight types of eye drop products were sold at major retailers, including CVS, Walgreens, and Rite Aid. They have expiration dates ranging from April to October.
The FDA, in its Enforcement Reports, stated that the products recalled “lack of assurance of sterility.”
While so far, there are no reports of injuries associated with the eye drops, the FDA notice classified the action as a “Class II recall.”
Class II recalls apply to products that can cause “temporary or medically reversible” health problems.
As per the FDA, "the probability of a serious health issue is remote," over these products, and that is why the recall is categorized as a Class II, USA TODAY reported
"Patients and consumers can continue using the medicine unless otherwise directed by the recalling company or FDA," the regulator said in a statement to the publication.
Also read: Can 'Eye Strain' Lead To Brain Cancer? Experts Explain
NBC News reported that the recalled products include:
Also read: Struggling With Dry Eyes? Study Reveals Surprising Treatment- Tips To Prevent This Disease
The key to ensuring that your eyes are protected from environmental factors like the sun, dust, and dirt, especially for those who work outdoors or spend long hours on screen, is investing in good sunglasses with ultraviolet protection.
"For those who are using computers a lot, you need to blink your eyes constantly, take breaks in between, and drink a lot of water. Dehydration is also a contributing factor to dry eye," Dr Anita Sethi, who is Principal Director and HOD Ophthalmology, Max Multi Specialty Centre at Panchsheel Park.
She also recommends using zero-number protective glasses and computer glasses that can decrease strain and dry eye.
While advising people to stay away from natural remedies like turmeric or ginger put inside the eye, Dr Sethi urged people to consume more “foods rich in vitamin E, antioxidants” to maintain eye health.
“Colored vegetables and fruits, and even maintaining thyroid and vitamin D levels, because these also contribute to dry eye,” the ophthalmologist said.
Vape pens have chemicals that can damage DNA. (Photo credit: iStock)
Smokers turn to vaping thinking that it is cooler and more convenient. Little do they realise that this seemingly convenient act could cause long-term damage, most of it irreversible. Scientists now fear that vaping could be linked to not one, but two forms of cancer. E-cigarettes can trigger lung and mouth cancer, and this is a consequence of the DNA-damaging chemicals found in vapes. Researchers at the University of New South Wales in Sydney came to this conclusion after reviewing studies on mice that developed lung tumours after being exposed to aerosol. Reports also suggest that heavy smokers are more prone to mouth cancer.
Vapour from pens has a relatively better fragrance compared to conventional cigarettes, as these pens are flavoured. However, researchers say that these pens contain chemicals that can cause cancer, damage DNA, and lead to tissue inflammation. Researchers also say that e-cigarettes contain nicotine, which is likely to trigger lung and mouth cancer. However, the extent of this effect in humans is still unknown.
Read more: Parents Who Smoke May Be Passing Severe Lung Disease Risk To Their Children
Lead researchers of the study said that they would only be able to determine the precise risk once long-term studies are available. Contrary to popular belief, while many believe that vaping is far safer than smoking, the study’s findings act as a warning for all those who use a vape but have not smoked a cigarette in their life. Experts at the University of Sydney noted that vaping is a safer alternative to smoking for smokers. However, the research has drawn criticism for being “problematic” and “misleading”.
Experts at University College London said that no one would argue that e-cigarettes are completely risk-free. Rather, they said, vapes should be used as a harm-reduction tool to help smokers quit the habit, thereby reducing their risk of chronic and acute health problems, such as heart disease. The review, however, does not give a free pass to use e-cigarettes. It issues a warning against the use of vapes, citing risks of lung and oral cancer. At a time when vape use has increased suddenly, overtaking the popularity of smoking, research is necessary to discourage people, especially youngsters, from adopting the habit in the first place.
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited