Credits: Canva
Kristan Hawkins, who is the head of the national anti-abortion group Students For Life, is used to protests from abortion rights supporters during her college campus tours. However, she is now also facing opposition that too from a surprising source — other anti-abortion activists.
These critics call themselves abortion abolitionists. They have started to show up at Hawkin's events. They also accuse her for being too soft, and calling her a "baby killer". They are now demanding harsher penalties for women who get abortions. Due to the rising tensions, Hawkins has had to increase security and even send alerts to donors to help cover costs. As the Associated Press reports, she now also knows the price of a bomb dog.
Abortion abolitionists believe abortion is murder—and should be treated that way under the law. Unlike mainstream anti-abortion groups, which typically target abortion providers, abolitionists want women who get abortions to be prosecuted, even sentenced to death in some cases. They’ve gained momentum since Roe v. Wade was overturned in 2022 and Republicans took full political control last year.
As of in 2025, lawmakers in 12 states, including Alabama, Georgia, Texas and Oklahoma have introduced bills that would allow prosecutors to charge women with homicide for abortions. Though most of these bills have not been passed, the fact that they are being considered shows the influence of abolitionists on abortion rights and health laws in general.
Mainstream anti-abortion groups have tried to play down the divisions, focusing on shared goals like defunding Planned Parenthood. But many leaders are growing alarmed at the aggressive tactics and rhetoric coming from abortion abolitionists.
Hawkins herself posted on X in February that she’s more afraid of being attacked by fellow anti-abortion activists than by abortion rights supporters. The backlash was swift: She was called a “demon” and “enemy of God,” and some demanded she resign. Some even said women like her shouldn’t be leading anti-abortion groups at all.
Christian nationalist influencers have also amplified these voices. One podcaster blamed feminism for abortion, saying Christian men should lead the fight.
Experts like Laura Hermer, a law professor in Minnesota, say the fall of Roe has emboldened the most extreme voices. And they’re starting to shape policy.
A 2022 KFF poll showed that around 80% of Americans oppose laws that would punish women for having abortions. However, Dana Sussman from Pregnancy Justice tells a media outlet that the number of such bills is rising sharply. What once sparked outrage is now becoming normalized.
Some lawmakers and advocates within the anti-abortion movement are pushing back. In North Dakota, a bill to prosecute women failed after major anti-abortion groups voiced opposition. In Oklahoma, a similar bill also died—but its co-sponsor, Sen. Dusty Deevers, said he plans to keep pushing for it, calling it “progress.”
She places herself in the third category, saying the focus should be on shifting culture and law gradually—not punishing women. “If you want more pro-abortion Democrats to win elections, then keep talking about putting women in jail,” she warned.
Credits: Canva
Health officials in Hood River County of Oregon are now investigating the three suspected cases of a rare and a fatal brain disorder. It is called the Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD). What is even more concerning is that two residents of the small county have already been reported dead and a third case is currently under review. While CJD is extremely rare, with a cluster of cases in the community of just 24,000 which prompt its serious concern, a deeper look at this mysterious disease could help people understand more about it.
Before we delve into how it happens or what causes, let us first understand what is it. CJD is degenerative brain disorder that is caused by abnormal or infectious proteins, also known as prions. Unlike bacteria or viruses, prions are misfolded protein which can induce normal protein in the bodies to misfold itself too. It can also lead to severe and irreversible brain damage. These proteins accumulate and cause the brain to develop sponge-like holes, which disrupt normal function and lead to a rapid mental and physical decline.
As per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), most patients diet within a year of symptom onset and there is currently no cure of that same.
We have already established the fact that it is a rare disease. In fact, as per the National Institutes of Health (NIH) only 350 cases of CJD is diagnosed in the US each year. This translates into 1 to 2 cases per million people, annually. Most cases—about 85%—are considered sporadic, meaning they arise without any known cause or risk factors.
Other types include:
Familial CJD (about 10–15% of cases), caused by inherited mutations in the prion protein gene.
Acquired CJD, which is extremely rare, can result from exposure to infected brain or nervous system tissue, often during certain medical procedures or, in even rarer cases, through the consumption of infected cattle (known as variant CJD).
Health officials in Hood River have stated that the current cases do not appear to be linked to cattle consumption, and it’s unclear whether the individuals were related or had any shared genetic factors.
CJD progresses rapidly. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) and CDC, early symptoms can include:
As the disease advances, patients often lose the ability to move or speak and may enter a coma. The rapid progression makes early diagnosis difficult and complicates treatment, especially in communities with limited access to specialized neurological care.
In the Hood River cases, one of the diagnoses was done through an autopsy. This is also one of the most definitive way to identify CJD by analyzing the brain tissue under a microscope. Testing it for prion proteins then reveals the result. Two other cases are considered likely, however, the results are pending.
Because CJD is so difficult to confirm during life, doctors often rely on clinical symptoms, advanced imaging like MRI, and spinal fluid tests to support a diagnosis. But confirmation usually requires a postmortem examination.
The National Prion Disease Pathology Surveillance Center at Case Western Reserve University plays a key role in diagnosing and studying cases in the U.S. Dr. Brian Appleby, the center’s director, notes that genetic testing can also help determine whether a case is inherited.
Credits: Canva
In a significant shift, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has announced its plan to reduce its reliance on animal testing for drug development. This is especially for monoclonal antibody therapies and other advanced medicines. The agency now plans to use more human-relevant technologies in order to improve safety, lower costs and also speed up the approval process.
Animal testing has remained the cornerstone of all experiments, whether medicine or space. Since the 1930s, when the US passed the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act in response to the tragic consequence of untested medication, animal testing was mandated. Scientists have been using mice, rats, rabbits and other animals to test for toxicity, side effects, as well ass efficacy before any new drug could be forwarded for human trial.
Over the decades, this practice also helped introduce many life-saving treatments. However, it has also raised ethical concerns and scientific questions, especially on how accurately can animal models really predict human response.
The FDA’s new initiative represents a "paradigm shift," according to its Commissioner, Dr. Martin A. Makary. There are several reasons behind this change:
Limited Predictive Value: Drugs that work safely in animals don’t always perform the same way in humans. This mismatch can lead to failed clinical trials or unexpected side effects in people.
Ethical Concerns: As public awareness and concern about animal welfare have grown, so too has the demand for more humane research methods.
Cost and Time: Animal testing is expensive and time-consuming. Each stage of testing can take months or years and cost millions of dollars.
Scientific Advancements: New technologies now offer better ways to model human biology and disease. These methods not only spare animals but also yield more accurate data.
The FDA is planning to incorporate innovative tools like computer modeling and AI, human organoids, and organ-on-a-chip technology, as well as real world human data.
How Will these Work? The computer modeling and AI will allow the scientists with the help of simulations to predict how a drug will behave in the human body based on its chemical structure, genetics, and existing medical data.
Furthermore, human organoids are miniature, lab-grown versions of human organs like a liver or brain which are made from stem cells. They also closely mimic how real organs function and could be used to test drug safety and effectiveness.
Organ on a chip technology involves tiny chips that simulate the activity of the entire organ systems. For instance, how the heart beats or the lungs breathe. It allows for more accurate and efficient testing.
The agency is also planning to rely more on existing human clinical data from other countries with comparable regulatory standards. If a drug has already been tested and used abroad, repeating animal testing for the same in the US should not be any longer a mandate.
The new approach will be applied immediately to investigational new drug applications—essentially, the first step in bringing a new treatment to the U.S. market. This means that pharmaceutical companies can now submit non-animal safety data as part of their applications.
Importantly, this doesn’t mean animal testing will be banned entirely. In some cases, it may still be required to answer specific safety questions. However, the goal is to make animal studies the exception, not the rule.
Credits: Canva
North Carolina is grappling a disturbing public healthcare crisis as flu-related deaths reach a record high for the 2024–2025 respiratory virus season. At over 500 across the state, this year is the deadliest flu season since the state initiated flu surveillance back in 2009. The severity of the trend not only emphasizes the need for early detection and inoculation but also calls into question public health readiness and community vigilance on an urgent basis.
As per a press release by the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services (NCDHHS), the alarming increase in deaths from the flu is nearly equal to the deaths from COVID-19 throughout the state for the time period in question. This symmetry is surprising, given that flu has long been thought of as a lesser seasonal disease. Reality, as the numbers now indicate, is much darker.
Flu deaths in North Carolina have jumped to more than 500, a 3,933% increase from the 2008–2009 season when 12 flu-related deaths were recorded. So far, the worst flu season ever was 2017–2018, when 391 individuals died statewide. This season, however, has rewritten the public health narrative completely.
Pediatric fatalities have also raised concern among experts, particularly since 75% of these fatalities took place among children who were unvaccinated. This too adds to the sense of urgency surrounding flu vaccination, especially for susceptible age groups.
NCDHHS Secretary Devdutta Sangvai recognized the tireless efforts of public health workers in all 100 counties and noted that the burden could have been even heavier without their efforts in education, vaccination campaigns, and treatment support.
But budget reductions and declining federal funds are now starting to reveal their impact. Health officials caution that a stretched system has left the state more vulnerable to outbreaks—not just of the flu, but of other respiratory viruses too.
In spite of strong scientific data endorsing flu immunization, the percentage of individuals getting the flu vaccine keeps dropping. According to infectious disease specialist Dr. David Weber, this is because widespread misinformation is the reason.
“One of the biggest reasons people skip the flu shot is a false belief that they’re not at risk,” he said. “People often think, ‘I’m young and healthy, I’ll be fine.’ But the truth is, flu can seriously affect anyone, regardless of age.”
Weber equates getting a flu shot with buckling up—yes, there are occasional side effects, but the advantages are well worth it. Vaccination, he insists, dramatically cuts hospitalizations and deaths.
Although the flu is hazardous to all, there are a few groups that are especially at risk:
For them, annual flu vaccination isn't only advised—it's necessary.
Early recognition of flu symptoms can be lifesaving. Flu symptoms can also develop rapidly, and prompt treatment—particularly with antiviral medications such as Tamiflu—can sharply decrease severity and duration of illness.
Watch for the following symptoms:
If you or a loved one starts to feel these symptoms, particularly if you are in a high-risk group, get immediate medical attention and testing.
Public health officials emphasize that even as the season reaches its peak, it's not too late to become vaccinated. Flu season usually lasts through May, providing individuals and families with a valuable window to protect their health.
Other prevention measures include:
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited