BMI has been the benchmark in evaluating health and fitness for many years. The formula is quite simple: weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters. This would easily tell if one is underweight, within the healthy weight range, overweight, or obese. But with new research findings, scientists are now questioning its accuracy and usefulness as a total measure of body composition.
The report, published in The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, has sparked a global conversation on rethinking BMI. Supported by more than 50 international medical experts, the report suggests classifying obesity into "clinical" and "pre-clinical" types for better diagnosis and treatment. The shift underscores a growing consensus: BMI alone may not tell the full story of your health.
While BMI is simple to calculate and universally accessible, it is far from perfect. It does not consider muscle mass, bone density, or fat distribution, leading to misleading conclusions in some cases. For example, athletes with a high muscle mass may be considered overweight, whereas individuals with normal BMI might carry unhealthy amounts of visceral fat.
A landmark study in JAMA Network Open studied more than 155,000 postmenopausal women and found that women with a normal BMI but a waist size over 35 inches were more likely to die from heart disease or cancer compared with their counterparts whose waists are smaller. That makes a great case for how BMI can be insufficient and fat distribution must be factored into account.
Not all body fat is equal. Subcutaneous fat, which lies just beneath the skin, is relatively harmless. The real health danger lies in visceral fat—fat that surrounds internal organs. Unlike subcutaneous fat, visceral fat is metabolically active, releasing stress hormones like cortisol and inflammatory substances that raise blood pressure, blood sugar, and cholesterol levels. These effects significantly increase the risk of conditions such as heart disease, type 2 diabetes, and certain cancers.
Since BMI is not the most reliable measure, scientists and doctors have sought other means to measure body composition more accurately.
A simple tape measure can provide valuable insight into your health. Measure your waist at the level of your belly button, ensuring the tape is parallel to the ground. For women, a waist measurement under 35 inches is considered healthy, while for men, the goal is under 40 inches.
This is the ratio of your waist circumference to that of your hips. To calculate it, divide your waist measurement by your hip measurement. According to the National Center for Biotechnology Information, a ratio under 0.8 for women and 0.9 for men is considered healthy.
A newer method that seems to be receiving more attention involves the Body Roundness Index or BRI: height, weight, and girth are placed together to represent a more advanced view of what body composition says. Research presented in JAMA Network Open offers evidence that this BRI predicts mortality risk greater than BMI in some cases- a promising weapon for public health.
Also Read: Using BMI To Classify People As Obese Is Flawed Say Experts
The good news is that visceral fat responds well to lifestyle changes. Here are three evidence-based strategies:
Adopting an eating window of 12 hours—such as from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m.—can significantly reduce visceral fat, according to a study published in Nutrition Research Reviews. This approach not only helps control caloric intake but also reduces late-night snacking, a known risk factor for abdominal obesity.
Excessive alcohol consumption is associated with increased belly fat. A 2017 study published in Public Health Nutrition revealed that alcohol increases the levels of insulin and encourages the storage of fat in the abdominal area. Limiting alcohol to occasional indulgence helps avoid weight gain in this region.
HIIT involves repeated episodes of high-intensity exercise separated by periods of rest. A review in *Sports Medicine* concluded that HIIT is very effective in reducing visceral and total body fat. It can be noted that adding just 20 minutes of HIIT two times a week can make all the difference.
The reliance on BMI as a sole indicator of health is increasingly being challenged. While it remains a convenient screening tool, its limitations necessitate a broader approach that considers factors like fat distribution, waist circumference, and new metrics such as BRI.
In the simplest of words, health is multi-dimensional, and shifting perspectives from considering weight solely to broader measures of body composition will get people a much clearer understanding of where their health risks are so that they can take the action required for a better quality of life. Through adjustment to diet, exercise, or perhaps through innovative metrics like BRI, health is well within reach of the individual.
This dynamic conversation raises the point about personalized health screenings, which helps everyone get more relevant tools fitting their unique lives and circumstances. As body composition research is enhanced, so do the futures look brighter and brighter for the times of measurement when it comes to health.
Definition and diagnostic criteria of clinical obesity. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology.
Association of Normal-Weight Central Obesity With All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality Among Postmenopausal Women. JAMA Netw Open. 2019
Waist-Hip Ratio. NIH.
Physiological responses to food intake throughout the day. Nutr Res Rev. 2014
Association between abdominal obesity and alcohol drinking pattern in normal-weight, middle-aged adults. Public Health Nutr. 2017
Credit: AI
Most athletes and gym-goers cannot help but boast about the many benefits of creatine. When it comes to boosting performance and supporting muscle growth, this supplement is trusted often.
But a new study suggests that creatine may also have benefits when you are out of the gym. But the researchers caution that it does not mean that creatine can replace exercise, especially strength training.
Researchers at Texas A&M University found that adults who took creatine gained lean tissue and improved muscle strength even when they did not follow a structured exercise programme. The 12-week study was published in the Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition.
The study is based on 64 healthy adults aged 45 to 65 who completed the 12-week intervention. Participants were divided into exercise and non-exercise groups and were randomly assigned to take either 10 grams of creatine monohydrate or a placebo every day.
The exercise group followed resistance and aerobic training three times a week, while the other participants did not follow a structured exercise programme.
Among those who did not exercise, those taking creatine gained about 2.4 pounds (1.1 kg) of lean tissue over 12 weeks. They also improved their leg and bench-press strength. Those who combined creatine with exercise saw even greater improvements in strength.
Creatine occurs naturally in the body and helps cells produce energy. Most of the body's creatine is stored in skeletal muscle, where it helps regenerate ATP, the main source of energy for the cells.
This is one reason creatine has traditionally been associated with better performance during short, intense exercise. The researchers believe its ability to support cellular energy may also help preserve or even increase lean tissue, especially in middle-aged adults.
The study also studied whether creatine could help people preserve muscle while losing weight.
Participants following the exercise and low-calorie diet who took creatine gained nearly 3 pounds of lean tissue while reducing fat mass.
The exercise and diet group taking placebo showed little change in lean tissue. Creatine was also associated with a greater reduction in body fat percentage. This could be relevant during weight loss, when some muscle loss may occur along with fat loss.
The small study is lasted only 12 weeks and also involved healthy adults aged 45 to 65, so the results cannot be applied to younger people, older adults with health conditions, or other people with muscle disorders.
The findings are also somewhat different from the much larger body of evidence showing that creatine's most established benefits occur when it is combined with resistance training.
Maintaining muscle becomes crucial with age. Loss of muscle mass and strength can affect mobility and physical function. The Texas A&M researchers say the findings add to growing interest in creatine as a tool for healthy ageing and maintaining muscle.
Credit: AI
Eli Lilly’s highly anticipated GLP-1 weight-loss drug retatrutide has delivered nearly 21% average weight loss in people with type 2 diabetes and obesity, according to results from a large Phase 3 trial published in The Lancet. In an ever-expanding weight loss medication market, retatrutide is already showing significant promise in obesity and diabetes management.
The drug, retatrutide, is being developed by Eli Lilly and is not approved by the FDA yet. In the TRIUMPH-2 trial, people receiving the highest 12 mg dose lost an average of 20.8% of their body weight over 80 weeks, equivalent to about 49.6 pounds or 22.5 kg.
The findings about retatrutide's trial were presented at the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) annual meeting in Milan and published simultaneously in The Lancet.
Retatrutide is a triple agonist because it activates three hormone receptors:
GLP-1-based medicines are already widely used for diabetes and obesity. Retatrutide activates GIP and glucagon pathways as well, creating a three-way approach to manage appetite, blood sugar and metabolism. The drug is given once weekly by injection and remains experimental and investigational.
Also read: World Heart Day: You Feel Healthy. But Plaque May Already Be Building In Your Arteries In Your 20s
TRIUMPH-2 included adults with obesity or overweight and type 2 diabetes. Participants receiving retatrutide were assigned to 4 mg, 9 mg or 12 mg doses and followed for 80 weeks. The average weight loss was:
The response was even greater among participants who started the study with a BMI of at least 35. Those receiving 12 mg lost an average of 23.4% of their body weight, or about 60.8 pounds.
By week 80, 59.5% of people taking 12 mg no longer met the BMI criteria for obesity.
Retatrutide not only led to one of the biggest weight losses ever seen, it also improved HbA1c, a measure of average blood glucose over the previous two to three months. At 80 weeks, HbA1c fell by:
Up to 40% of participants receiving retatrutide achieved an HbA1c below 5.7%, which is within the normal range.
The results are certainly seem promising, particularly as people with type 2 diabetes can sometimes lose less weight with obesity medicines than people without diabetes.
Retatrutide's combination of substantial weight loss and improved blood sugar control makes it an important drug to watch in a competitive GLP-1 market.
Since it's not approved yet, more evidence will be needed on its long-term safety, cardiovascular effects and how its benefits compare with existing treatments. It is also worth remembering that the 20.8% figure represents an average, not the amount every participant lost.
Retatrutide's development is a sign that obesity and diabetes treatment is extending beyond just managing blood sugar. The next generation of drugs is all about targeting weight, glucose and metabolism together.
Sudden bursts of intense exercise after a sedentary routine can put extra stress on the heart, doctors say. (Image Credits: Istock)
Exercise is good for the heart. That part is not in question. But on the occasion of World Heart Day, doctors say the way you exercise, and how suddenly you start, can matter just as much as whether you exercise at all.
A lot of us live sedentary weekdays and then try to make up for it with one hard gym, swimming or sports session over the weekend. Dr Dhirendra Singhania, Director of Interventional Cardiology at Yashoda Medicity, says this pattern puts real strain on the body. "In an untrained person, a sudden switch to a much increased load in terms of time or intensity of training is a huge physiological stress on the heart," he told Health and Me.
Dr Ajeet Singh, Senior Consultant and Head of Cardiology at ShardaCare Healthcity, describes the same risk from the other direction. "Stepping into a sedentary lifestyle with a sudden burst of extreme activity, and vice versa, can strain the heart," he told Health and Me. Weekend sport, after a week of sitting, is one of the most common triggers.
Dr Udgeath Dhir, Principal Director, Cardio Thoracic and Vascular Surgery at Fortis Gurugram, points to a related trend: people jumping straight into long-distance running or marathon training without building up to it. "Suddenly pushing an untrained body into long-distance running, marathon training or extreme high-intensity workouts can place unnecessary acute stress on the cardiovascular system," he says.
Medical literature backs this up. New England Journal of Medicine study found that people who exercised regularly were far better protected against a heart attack being triggered by sudden exertion than those who rarely worked out. Research published in Circulation notes that the least fit individuals face the greatest risk during sudden physical effort. Doctors describe this as a fitness "buffer". A trained heart handles a sharp rise in oxygen demand and blood pressure far better than an untrained one.
This doesn't mean irregular exercise is pointless. A large 2023 study in JAMA, using activity-tracker data from close to 90,000 people, found that "weekend warriors" who packed their exercise into one or two days had a similarly lower cardiovascular risk to people who spread activity evenly through the week. The catch, researchers noted, is that this benefit shows up in people who are already getting regular activity in some form. Suddenly forcing an untrained body into a high-intensity session is a different scenario altogether.
All three doctors agree that people with undiagnosed heart problems, high blood pressure, high cholesterol, diabetes or a family history of heart disease need to be more cautious. Dr Singh says this doesn't mean exercise should be avoided. It simply has to match "age, fitness level, and overall health and medical history." Dr Singhania advises anyone with existing heart disease or risk factors to consult their doctor before starting intense activity.
All three point to the same red flags. Chest pain or pressure, unusual breathlessness, dizziness, a racing heart, or simply feeling off during exercise. Dr Singhania lists "angina, unusual breathlessness, pre-syncope, syncope and palpitations" as symptoms that should never be ignored.
The advice from all three doctors is simple. Warm up. Build intensity gradually. Cool down. Stay hydrated. And if something feels wrong mid-workout, stop and consult a doctor rather than trying to push through the discomfort. As Dr Dhir puts it, "Fitness is not about pushing the body to its maximum every day; it is about building a level of fitness that your individual heart can safely sustain."
© $2026 Times Horizon Private Limited