Credit: Canva
Whether you're lifting heavy weights at the gym or sitting for long hours at your desk, a strong set of glutes is essential for overall health and functionality. Gluteus maximus—the largest muscle in the body—plays a crucial role in supporting your spine and assisting in movements like walking, running, and jumping. Now, when you think about this muscle, you think about complex exercises like deadlifts or kettlebell swings, however one simple yet effective move you can do anywhere is the glute bridges.
The glute bridge is an easy exercise which is accessible to anyone, regardless of skill level and can be performed anywhere. It can be done at the gym, on the floor at home, or even at the office. Fitness experts call it a versatile exercise that activates not only your glutes but also your hamstrings and core. Moreover, it is an excellent warm-up for experienced lifters before heavy training.
While this exercise primarily targets the glutes, it also engages the hamstrings and core, helping to stabilize the body and improve posture. It is pertinent to note that a strong core is pivotal to performing daily activities.
2. Squeeze your core to create tension, and think about pulling your shoulder blades down toward your hips.
3. Lift your hips toward the ceiling by squeezing your glutes and pushing through your heels. Avoid arching your lower back.
4. Hold at the top for one to two seconds, then lower your hips back down to the ground.
Your goal should be to form a straight line from your knees to shoulders, ensuring no arching in the back. Beginners may not raise their hips very high at first, but with practice, they can aim for a perfect alignment.
The glute bridge can be incorporated into your workout routine as a warm-up or stand-alone exercise. Beginners should aim for 3–4 sets of 10–12 reps, focusing on proper form. Advanced trainees may use the glute bridge as a warm-up for heavier exercises, doing 30-second intervals with short rests. If you spend long hours sitting, try doing a few sets throughout the day to keep your posterior muscles engaged.
1. Squats: Classic and powerful, squats target your glutes, quads, and hamstrings. You can do bodyweight squats or add dumbbells/barbells for more intensity.
2. Lunges: Forward, reverse, and walking lunges are excellent for engaging the glutes while also improving balance and coordination.
3. Step-Ups: Using a bench or sturdy platform, step-ups activate the glutes, especially when you push through your heel on the working legs.
4. Deadlifts (especially Romanian or Single-Leg Deadlifts): These strengthen the glutes and hamstrings while also working your lower back and core.
5. Donkey Kicks: This bodyweight move isolates the glute muscles and is great for glute activation. You can add ankle weights or resistance bands for an extra challenge.
Credit: AI
Your date of birth indicates your chronological age, but it may not reflect the actual picture of how your body is ageing. According to Dr Prateek Sharma, professor of medicine at the University of Kansas, simple measures like grip strength, walking speed and VO₂ max could help assess a person’s biological age and life span.
Speaking at a session on Longevity in the Indian Context: Diet, Supplements and Myths, Sharma said the focus is gradually shifting from simply asking how long people live to how many years they can remain healthy and functional.
He said, “Soon, biological age will be measured through indicators such as epigenetics, grip strength, gait and VO2 max, rather than chronological age.”
Chronological age is the number of years that passed since you were born. Biological age, on the other hand, captures how your well body is functioning as years pass and how quickly it may be ageing.
Two people who are both 50 may have very different levels of muscle strength, cardiovascular fitness, metabolic health, and mobility.
Dr. Sharma says that apart from genes, lifestyle and environment factors play a key role in healthy ageing.
He said, “Genes are important. Genes load the gun, but environment and lifestyle are the ones that pull the trigger as well.”
He added that factors including diet, sleep, physical activity and environment can substantially influence healthy ageing.
Lower grip strength has often been associated with conditions including frailty and sarcopenia. Additionally, research has linked poor grip strength with higher risks of hospitalisation and mortality.
A 2024 review described handgrip strength as a potentially useful health biomarker, although the measurement also needs to account for factors like age, sex and complete body size.
It is important to note that there is no single grip-strength number that can tell everyone their biological age.
Also read: Study Finds The Wealthiest Americans Had Higher Mortality Than The Poorest Europeans
The way a person walks can also provide signs about their physical function. Gait speed reflects how multiple systems work together. These systems include muscle strength, balance, coordination, cardiovascular fitness and neurological function.
A slow walking pace can therefore sometimes be an early sign of declining physical function and poor biological age.
Despite promising findings, expert caution that mobility tests are not sureshot ways for predicting lifespan. They are better considered as screening tools that can alert doctors to possible health issues that require further assessment.
Auriel Willette, an expert in brain ageing from Rutgers University said, “A poor or declining result is a reason for a health professional to investigate why function is changing, rather than gauging how long someone will live.”
Grip strength and gait are greatly influenced by age, body composition, injuries, neurological conditions, physical activity, overall fitness, and other lifestyle factors. A temporary decline may not necessarily mean a person is ageing rapidly.
Doctors can potentially use these findings to measures the loss of strength or mobility early. It could help them decide when interventions like exercise, nutrition and treatment of underlying health problems may help.
Credit: AI
For years, people trying to lose weight have been told that slow and steady is the safest and most sustainable approach. But a new study is challenging that long-standing advice.
Researchers found that losing weight more quickly may actually lead to greater weight loss that can be maintained over time.
The findings, presented at the European Congress on Obesity 2026, followed 284 adults with obesity, around 90% of whom were women. Researchers compared a rapid weight-loss method with a more gradual approach.
During the first 16 weeks, participants in the rapid weight-loss group followed a low-calorie diet that started below 1,000 calories a day and gradually increased to around 1,500 calories. The gradual-loss group consumed approximately 1,400 calories a day.
Those in the rapid-loss group lost an average of 12.9% of their body weight during the first 16 weeks, compared with 8.1% among those following the gradual approach. But the researchers were particularly interested in what happened after the initial weight-loss phase.
Both groups subsequently entered a 36-week weight-maintenance program, receiving regular support and guidance on maintaining healthy eating habits.
After one year, the rapid-loss group had still lost more weight overall, averaging 14.4% of their starting body weight, compared with 10.5% in the gradual-loss group.
Also read: Meniscus Tears: Why Runners & Athletes Shouldn't Ignore This Common Knee Injury
The study challenges the idea that rapid weight loss automatically leads to weight regain. It does not mean people should drastically cut back calories or attempt crash diets.
HealthandMe spoke to Dr Rajiv Kovil, Diabetes & Obesity Specialist, S L Raheja Hospital, to understand which approach is truly sustainable for long-term weight loss.
He says, “Scientifically, this reinforces an important concept: the speed of initial weight loss and the sustainability of weight loss are not necessarily opposites. Larger early weight loss may provide metabolic benefits, improve mobility and motivation, and give patients a greater “weight-loss buffer” before biological pressures favouring regain become prominent.”
One of the most important details is that the rapid-loss programme was structured and professionally supervised, with consistent support after the initial weight-loss period.
He further explains, “This was rapid, medically structured weight loss—not unsupervised crash dieting. Participants received continued behavioural and weight-regain-prevention support. Moreover, the results are currently reported from a conference presentation rather than a fully peer-reviewed publication, and body-composition and energy-expenditure data were not reported.”
Dr Kovil goes on to say that truly sustainable weight loss should never revolve around the number of kilograms lost.
He said, “The message therefore is not “faster is always better.” It is that obesity treatment should move away from an arbitrary obsession with the rate of kilograms lost.”
Dr Marie Spreckley of the University of Cambridge said the study involved an intensive intervention with frequent professional support, meaning the results may not necessarily translate to unsupervised dieting in everyday life.
Dr Dimitrios Koutoukidis of the University of Oxford also cautioned that the study was based on limited data from a conference abstract and mostly involved women.
The traditional argument is that gradual weight loss is easier to maintain and may reduce the risk of losing muscle or encourage weight regain.
But experts say the new findings suggest the speed of weight loss itself may not be the main factor determining whether weight comes back. What may matter more is what happens after the weight comes off.
Dr Adam Collins of the University of Surrey noted that metabolic adaptation and reductions in lean mass appear to relate more closely to the total amount of weight lost than simply how quickly it was lost.
Dr Kovil concludes, “In obesity medicine, the real endpoint is not how slowly you lose weight—it is how safely you lose fat, preserve muscle and maintain the metabolic benefit. Sustainability is determined less by the speed of weight loss and more by the quality and continuity of long-term treatment.”
Credit: AI
If there is something common to active individuals, then it is the habit of downplaying knee pain as "just a strain." Runners complete races despite feeling some discomfort, weekend football enthusiasts freeze their knees and return to the game, while fitness lovers believe that the pain will go away after a few days of rest.
Sometimes the pain fades away. Yet sometimes it remains, showing signs of a meniscus tear, one of the most common knee injuries among active individuals.
The meniscus is a semi lunar ‘C’ shaped fibrocartilage structure that acts as a shock absorber between the thigh bone and the shin bone. The meniscus cushions the knee and stabilizes the joint every time the person runs, jumps, squats, or turns.
In case of awkward knee twisting (especially when the foot is firmly pressed to the ground), the meniscus can be torn. Such injury can be often found in sports such as football, basketball, tennis, and badminton, as well as among leisure runners.
Many people mistakenly believe that a meniscus tear is always accompanied by severe pain. In reality, many people will continue running or playing after the injury as the symptoms are manageable at first. Patients may experience swelling within the same day, pain when going up the stairs, or experiencing the knee catching or being unable to completely straighten. These are the red flags that should be addressed, and not ignored.
Disregarding any of these symptoms can be detrimental. Continuing to stress the damaged knee may lead to aggravating the tear and putting more strain on the adjacent cartilage, thus increasing chances of developing early osteoarthritis. The sooner the injury is diagnosed, the higher chances a person receives help with preserving the meniscus, which is extremely important for the knee function for many years.
Also read: What Is Zone 2 Cardio? The Workout Everyone Is Talking About
Treatment performed in each case is not identical. Minor tears may be treated with physiotherapy, modification of a person’s lifestyle, and specific exercises aimed at making the muscles supporting the knee stronger. Severe tears or ones that cause recurrent locking or instability of the joint require certain surgical intervention like arthroscopic repair or balancing.
Probably, the most disregarded part of the process of healing is rehabilitation. Pain can go away before the knee gets its strength back, and that is the reason for many athletes getting injured again. A systematic return to activity helps to promote optimal healing for the knee.
If you are someone who likes to run or play sport, knee pain should never be an issue that becomes accepted. Often your body can let you know when there is something wrong. Paying attention to those early signs and being quick to seek medical advice can mean the situation can be managed properly.
By Dr. Attique Vasdev, Vice Chairman, Orthopaedics, Medanta Gurugram
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited