Image Credits: Canva
For centuries, the notion that abstaining from sex increases physical performance has been widely debated. From ancient Greek athletes to modern-day boxing legends such as Muhammad Ali and Mike Tyson, have practiced sexual restraint in the expectation of increasing strength, stamina, and hope. The famous scene in Rocky where trainer Mickey Goldmill tells Rocky Balboa to "lay off that pet shop dame", “women weaken legs,” further fueled this belief, reinforcing the belief that sex before competition weakens the body. But does science back this up, or is it merely an outdated myth?
The theory that sex saps energy and impairs performance goes back almost 2,000 years. Abstaining, ancient Greek athletes believed, would enhance aggression and concentration, leading them to become stronger competitors. Even today in the world of sports, people stick to this hypothesis despite the changing scientific findings. But during the Rio 2016 Olympics, officials gave away a staggering half a million condoms to participants—far from a indication that sex was being thought of as a performance-sapping activity.
Although some continue to abstain prior to major events, the real effect of sex on sports performance is still controversial. Is there any basis to the belief that sex inhibits strength and endurance, or is it merely an old wives' tale?
Testosterone is an essential hormone that is essential for muscle growth, power, and overall athletic performance. Although men naturally produce more than women, both sexes need testosterone for energy and recovery. Some athletes think not having sex maintains their testosterone levels, providing them with an advantage in the gym or on the field. But is this statement scientifically accurate?
Studies indicate that testosterone levels are not consistent throughout the day but are constantly being produced in the body. Unlike glycogen, which can be stored and used as energy, testosterone is controlled according to the needs of the body. Research does not indicate that having sex depletes testosterone levels significantly—if anything, it can increase them slightly through endorphin and dopamine release.
Some fitness enthusiasts skip sex before hard workouts because they think it takes away their energy. Although intense physical exercise (including sex) can cause temporary tiredness, there is no scientific evidence to support that sex deteriorates long-term strength or endurance.
A 2016 review article in Frontiers in Physiology reviewed nine studies of sex and performance in sports, and concluded there was no basis to believe sexual activity prior to competition would cause the body to be weakened. Another study, published in 2019 in the Journal of Sexual Medicine, found no statistically significant effect of sex on performance.
Whereas sex shortly before intense exercise may make you momentarily lethargic, it will not impair general performance, stamina, or muscular power. As an alternative, taking sufficient rest, eating appropriately, and exercising with a standard program are many more significant variables.
It is long believed by some men that ejaculation abstinence will result in a dramatic increase in testosterone. In 2003, researchers from China claimed that men who did not ejaculate for seven days experienced a short-term 45% rise in testosterone. Yet this response was not found to last past the seventh day, and subsequent experiments have been unable to duplicate this effect regularly.
Conversely, some studies show that testosterone levels actually increase slightly after sex, undermining the idea that abstinence is required for optimal performance. The bottom line? The body has a fine balance of hormone production, and sex abstinence is not likely to give any real athletic benefit.
Even though there is no scientific basis, most athletes still feel that sex impacts their performance. It may be because of the placebo effect—if a player believes that not having sex makes him or her stronger, he or she will be more confident and play better. Some players may also feel relaxed and more alert after sex, and this clears their minds for the competition.
Finally, the psychological effect of sexual activity can differ from individual to individual. Sports persons who believe abstinence allows them to remain aggressive may decide to abstain from sex prior to a big event. There are others who believe that sex helps in reducing stress and enhancing sleep and may gain from intimacy pre-competition.
Although the concept of forgoing sex to enhance gym performance has been around for generations, new research indicates that it does not have any noticeable effect on physical ability. Strength, stamina, and overall performance are more affected by training, nutrition, recovery, and psychological readiness than by sex.
If you think that abstinence makes you more aggressive and focused, you can do so without any ill effects. If sex makes you sleep better and relax, you might be increasing your performance rather than diminishing it. The message here is that there's no one-size-fits-all principle—players have to listen to their bodies and play in whatever way best suits them.
Ultimately, there is no scientific rationale for not having sex before you go to the gym or to compete. Whether you abstain or not, therefore, the outcome of your workout will come down to the effort you make, not the activity in the bedroom.
Credit: Canva
While exercise is good for the body and mind, it can have special benefits for the liver — a key organ that filters blood, breaks down food, stores energy, and keeps the human body in balance.
In recent years, there has been a significant increase in young patients presenting with poor liver health and related conditions, such as fatty liver and liver fibrosis, among others.
A recent study published in The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology journal showed that the Metabolically Dysfunctional-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD), formerly known as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), affected 1.3 billion people around the globe in 2023.
India has also shown a sharp rise in MASLD prevalence, up 23.19 per cent from 1990 to 2023. India’s age-standardized MASLD prevalence rate rose from 10,191 per 100,000 in 1990 to 12,555 per 100,000 in 2023.
The findings show that the spike is increasingly driven by rising metabolic risk factors, including high blood sugar and obesity.
Amid the growing burden, hepatologist Dr Cyriac Abby Philips noted that “the best friend of the liver is muscle”. In a post on social media platform X, Dr Philips, popularly known as Liverdoc, added that “liver listens to your muscles” and shared nine exercises, all backed by clinical trials, that can be included in a daily routine to help boost liver health.
Brisk walking:
According to Dr Philips, brisk walking is the most accessible liver medicine. He noted that "150 min per week cuts liver fat by more than 30 per cent on MRI”. Citing a UK Biobank study of 91,000 people, he added that every extra 1,000 daily steps can lower the risk of developing fatty liver by about 12 per cent.
Moderate-intensity cardio (MICT):
This includes steady jogging, cycling, or swimming at a "can talk, can't sing" pace. Dr Philips stated that 30–45 minutes of MICT exercises for 3–5 days every week for 12 weeks can help reduce liver fat by 2–4 per cent (absolute). It can also significantly lower liver inflammation (enzyme levels), even without weight loss.
High-intensity interval training (HIIT)
This includes short hard bursts, like burpees, jumping jacks, etc. He recommended four minutes of these exercises “at 85–95 per cent max heart rate”.
Repeating the exercise 4 times a day can “cut liver fat by 16–37 per cent, improve heart function,” in 12 weeks, the Liverdoc said. He added that the exercise regimen “matches steady cardio in half the time”.
Sprint interval training (SIT)
SITs are shorter and harder under 15-minute sessions of squat punches, knee hovers, and chair squats. “Six weeks of these can reduce intrahepatic triglycerides by 12 per cent and visceral fat by 17 per cent in men with fatty liver (MASLD),” said Dr Philips, adding that it gives the “biggest liver benefits for the smallest time spent”.
Resistance/strength training
This includes weights or bodyweight, such as squats, presses, rows, and pulldowns. Dr Philips recommended 3 sets of these exercises three times a week for about 40–45 min.
It can “reduce liver fat independent of weight loss, uniquely lowers liver enzyme, and is the single most important exercise for cirrhosis patients to prevent muscle loss (sarcopenia),” he said.
Combined aerobic + resistance
The Liverdoc stated that this combination is the gold standard for exercises. He noted that “network meta-analyses rank this combination as the number one for improving triglycerides, LDL, and total cholesterol in patients with fatty liver (MASLD) - better than either alone”.
Yoga (Hatha/ Surya Namaskar)
Dr Philips noted that classical yoga is not useful for liver health as it is not aerobic and vouched for the modernized versions.
“Eight to 12 weeks or 3 sessions/week of asanas like Surya Namaskar, Ardha Matsyendrasana, Paschimottanasana, Naukasana can help improve liver tests, insulin resistance, and fatty liver grade - especially in patients with type 2 diabetes plus fatty liver disease,” he said.
Pilates and core work
“Eight weeks of pilates can help reduce body weight, body fat, liver enzymes, and liver fat on ultrasound,” said Liverdoc. He called it a joint-friendly option for people who can't run or lift heavy.
Tai Chi / Qigong
The Chinese exercise is a low-impact mind-body movement. About 30–60 min of these three times a week can help “improve glucose control, insulin sensitivity, and balance/ stability, muscle tone," Dr. Philips said.
He noted that this form of exercise is “gentle enough for older patients, those with early decompensated cirrhosis, or people with poor cardiorespiratory fitness”.
Dr Philips said that even advanced liver disease can respond well to exercise treatment.
Citing randomized trials, he stated that “combined aerobic plus resistance training cuts serious events (death, major complications) from 12.3 per cent to 5.6 per cent”. It also “prevents the muscle wasting that drives death events in cirrhosis patients”.
“Make physical activity your number one preference to maintain liver health and reduce liver disease,” Dr Philips said.
Credit: Canva
For many working professionals, going to the gym often feels like a luxury. Their days begin early and end late—rushing for buses and metros, juggling deadlines, presentations, meetings, and endless reports.
So when they are diagnosed with conditions like diabetes or high blood pressure, the most practical and affordable option left is walking. Another common step is cutting down on sugar in tea and coffee. While these are good starting points, these may not be enough.
Calling them "most frustrating", Dr. Sudhir Kumar, Neurologist at Apollo Hospital, Hyderabad noted that such "patients are losing a battle they think they are winning".
"Every day, I see patients with obesity, Type 2 Diabetes, or hypertension who tell me: 'I walk every morning, Doctor'. 'I do all the household work.' 'I have stopped adding sugar to my tea'," said Dr Kumar, in a post on social media platform X.
He also cited these as "dangerous health misconceptions", wherein the patients feel they have done their part, but "their blood work and body composition tell a different story".
Popularly known as the Hyderabad doctor on X, the noted neurologist shared some evidence-based reality of why "walking and quitting sugar" may not be enough.
Several studies have pointed out that walking or undertaking household chores is better than a sedentary behavior. However, neither can be a "substitute for strength training", Dr. Kumar said.
Although walking can burn a few calories, "strength training builds the 'engine' that burns glucose even while you sleep".
"If you are not lifting weights or doing resistance training at least twice a week, your insulin resistance will likely persist, regardless of your step count", he said.
Speaking to HealthandMe, Dr. Manisha Arora, Director - Internal Medicine at the CK Birla Hospital, Delhi, explained that cutting sugar and walking are good first steps, but they do not solve the problem of diabetes and high blood pressure.
"Insulin resistance, inflammation, and loss of muscle all contribute to these diseases. Light walking may help, but the intensity and duration of exercise are also important," he added.
Strength training exercises force muscles to contract against an external force, such as body weight, dumbbells, or bands. Common examples include
Strength training helps
Dr. Kumar further mentioned the diet trap that most people fall into, that is., cutting out sweets and sugar, while loading up the plate with carbohydrate-rich foods such as rice, roti, and poha — 80 percent — and zero protein content.
"Refined carbohydrates (even without added sugar) spike insulin similarly to sugar," he said, calling "no sugar as the bare minimum".
The doctor noted that "a protein-deficient diet can lead to muscle loss and increase hunger".
To lower blood sugar levels, the experts urged to cut down on other foods, such as
"Focus on protein leverage. Prioritize 1.2g to 1.5g of protein per kg of body weight. When you hit your protein goals, your craving for carbs naturally drops," Dr. Kumar said.
To see the real change in blood sugar and BP levels, he advised people to "add two days of resistance training (bodyweight, bands, or weights)", instead of "just walking",.
The neurologist also recommended "starting the meal with protein paneer, eggs, sprouts, lean meat, and to eat carbs last, and in smaller portions".
In addition, a diet high in protein and fiber from whole grains, fruits, and nuts can also help control blood sugar levels.
"The most successful approach to controlling blood sugar results from combining aerobic exercise with strength training, along with balanced nutrition," said Dr Arora.
Credit: iStock
We often assume that having a “normal weight” automatically means being healthy. While body weight is an important parameter, it represents only a small part of overall health. True health is far more complex than what a number on the weighing scale can convey.
Body Mass Index (BMI) is widely used to classify individuals based on their weight relative to height. However, it does not differentiate between fat and muscle. As a result, someone may fall within the normal BMI range yet still have high body fat and low muscle mass, a condition known as “normal weight obesity.” Such individuals may appear healthy but remain at risk for metabolic disorders.
Body composition analysis offers deeper insight by evaluating fat, muscle mass, and their distribution in the body. A combination of low muscle mass and excess body fat, especially around internal organs, can increase disease risk, even when overall weight appears normal.
The role of fat distribution:
All body fat is not the same. Where fat is stored matters significantly. The waist-to-height ratio is now considered a more reliable indicator than BMI, as it reflects fat distribution. A ratio above 0.5 is associated with a higher risk of conditions such as type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and even increased mortality.
Looking beyond numbers:
Health cannot be defined by numbers alone. Factors like physical activity, nutrition, stress levels, and sleep quality play an equally critical role. Even individuals with a normal weight can experience poor metabolic health due to inadequate sleep or chronic stress.
The bigger perspective:
Good health is not just about appearance or weight, it is the result of multiple factors working together. It reflects a balance between internal processes and external lifestyle choices.
In essence, being of normal weight does not necessarily mean being healthy. To truly stay well, it is important to look beyond weight and consider the broader picture of health.
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited